Section 1: Overall
Competitiveness
1.
Gross Value Added and Household Disposable
Income per Head
Gross
Value Added and Household Sector Disposable
Income measure different aspects of a
region�s income. GVA gives an indication of
the value of the economic activity generated
within an area, whilst Household Sector income
provides an indication of the income received
by resident households and non-profit
organisations which serve households.
Since
the last publication of the Regional
Competitiveness Indicators in March 2001, the
statistic previously termed 'Gross Domestic
Product' has been renamed as �Gross Value
Added� (GVA). The change of title makes the
terminology consistent with the latest
European accounting framework. Refer to the
Definitions Section (Annex I) for a
description of these and other changes.
GVA
per Head
This
is an important indicator of the economic
activity generated within a region compared
with the region's resident population, and
shows changes over time. These figures have
been taken from the regional economic accounts
produced by the Office for National Statistics
(ONS). The latest available statistics at
regional level are for 1999.
The
statistics indicate that, since 1989, London
has consistently been the region with the
highest relative GVA, at between 142% and 148%
(UK = 100). In 1999 the English region with
the lowest relative GVA was the North East
(77.3%) while the figure for Northern Ireland
was similar (77.5%).
GVA
per Hour Worked
Introduced
for the first time in this edition of Regional
Competitiveness Indicators, these statistics
overcome one of the difficulties of GVA per
head of population as an indicator. This is
that the statistic of GVA generated within the
region (including wages) is generally
workplace based, while the population estimate
is based on residents within the region. Thus
commuting significantly effects the statistics
and regions with a high level of inward
commuting, such as London, will have an
artificially high GVA per head.
In
Table 1(b) GVA is presented relative to the
number of hours worked in the region, rather
than in terms of per head of population
resident. London, at 116.7% in 1999, remains
higher than the average (UK=100) but the
differences between regions are not as marked
as for GVA and HDI per head. The lowest figure
for GVA per hour worked, relative to the UK as
a whole, in 1999 was for Northern Ireland, at
83.5%. The lowest figure for an English region
was recorded for the West Midlands, at 90.3%
with the South West next at 90.4%.
Gross
Household Disposable Income per Head
Disposable
Household Sector income is defined
as total household income (including benefits)
less current taxes on income and wealth and
other social contributions such as National
Insurance and payments into life assurance and
pension funds. While GVA gives an indication
of the value of all economic activity in a
given area, Household Disposable Income (HDI)
is indicative of the income households within
regions have to spend on goods and services.
In
1999 disposable household income per head of
resident population in London was around one
fifth greater than for the UK as a whole. It
was substantially lower than the UK average in
the North East (17% lower) and Northern
Ireland (14% lower).
Since 1990,
disposable household income per head in
London, the South East and East have been
consistently above the UK average.
Chart
1(a)
Chart 1(b)
Chart
1(c)
2.
Labour Productivity in Manufacturing
and Other Industries
This
is used as an indicator of competitiveness
within the manufacturing and other sectors
(including services, mining, electricity and
gas supply, but not agriculture, forestry and
fishing). Tables 2(a)
and 2(b) are calculated
as GVA per employee.
Although
GVA per employee in manufacturing grew in all
regions between 1995 and 1998, in most regions
overall growth was either in line with, or
below Retail Price Index (RPI) inflation,
which was 11% over this period. The other
sectors have fared better, showing some growth
above the RPI level between these years.
It
is important to consider the value of these
indicators in the context of the mix of
industries between regions. Some industries
are highly labour intensive and so may have
relatively low employee productivity figures
when compared with more capital intensive
industries.
Chart 2 illustrates, the value of GVA per employee
for the manufacturing and other sectors
respectively in the UK regions during 1998.
Chart 2
The
number of Income Support Claimants is used as
an indicator of social deprivation.
Table
3(a) shows the number of Income Support
Claimants as a proportion of the population
over 16 years of age for quarters between 1997
and 2001. Tables 3(b) to
3(e) break down the
receipt of Income Support benefits by broad
client group, namely; pensioners, disabled,
lone parents and 'other' recipients. Since the
introduction of the Jobseeker�s Allowance (JSA)
in October 1996, claimants of unemployment -
related benefits are no longer included in the
Income Support figures. Estimates of both
Claimant Count and the ILO unemployment can be
found in Indicator 8.
As
a proportion of the adult population, in May
2001 Northern Ireland had the highest
percentage of claimants in any UK region /
country for each of the benefit categories
with the exception of lone parent benefits.
After Northern Ireland, the North East had the
highest proportion of pensioner income support
claimants. The North East, North West and
Wales all had the second highest proportions
who were disabled claimants whilst London had
the highest percentage of lone parent benefit
claimants.
Chart 3
4.
Manufacturing Investment and Output by UK and
Foreign Owned Companies
This
series is used as an indicator of the
attractiveness of a region to foreign
investors and, the importance of foreign
investment to the manufacturing base of a
region. Tables 4(a) and
4(b) show the trends
in the figures for the investment and output
(measured by GVA) by both foreign and UK-owned
companies. In 1997 approximately �20 billion
was invested in the UK, and around a third was
from foreign-owned companies.
Investment
is measured by Net Capital Expenditure. The
estimates for Individual years should be
treated with caution as large one-off
investment decisions by companies can make
significant differences to total investment
figures in a particular region and year. To
help overcome this, Chart 4 shows the average
percentage of manufacturing investment from
foreign-owned companies for the years 1994 to
1997 combined.
This
indicator only covers investment in
manufacturing businesses within the UK. The
latest available data, currently, is for 1997.
Chart 4
5.
Exports of Goods
Chart
5(a) illustrates the regional shares of total
UK exports of goods for quarters between
Autumn 2000 and Spring 2001. It should be
noted that the value of exports produced is
dependent on the size of the region's economy.
In addition to this, the production of some
goods (for example motor vehicles) can involve
several separate stages that may take place
across more than one region. Comparisons
between regions should be interpreted with
care because the value added of an export
product may have been generated in areas other
than the region from which the item was
exported.
Chart
5(b) details the value of exports for the
years 1999 and 2000 per employee job within
each region. During 2000, the East of England
had the highest value of exports per employee
job, followed closely by Scotland.
Regional
Export data do not cover the exports of
services at present, so it is important to
take account of a region�s industrial
profile when interpreting these figures.
Regions which have a high concentration of
service sector employees are likely to have a
lower level of exports of goods per total
employee jobs than regions with more
manufacturing employment.
Table
5(a) provides the value of exports from each
region for all quarters between 1999 and the
first quarter of 2001 as well as the totals
for the 1999 and 2000 expressed as a value per
employee job.
Table
5(b) gives the number of companies within each
region exporting within the European Union (EU)
and outside the EU for all quarters during
1999 and 2000. Companies who export to both EU
countries and the rest of the world will
appear more than once in the company count,
that is, in both parts of table 5(b).
Table
5 (c) shows proportions of exports of goods to
the main world regions. During 2000 around 75%
of total UK exports were to either the EU or
North America with exports to the EU
accounting for the majority of these.
Chart 5(a)
Chart 5(b)
| index |
Home - Search - Site Map - Contact Us
Site Information
|